The Need for a Primary Opponent for Obama

If you have seen this post before and are wondering why I would post it again it is because being  new to blogging I don’t know if the post was seen by anyone. I have had a very hard time accessing it myself.

My name is Lauri E. Kallio and I have an acute case of buyer’s remorse, as one who contributed many hours to Barack Obama’s presidential campaign in New Mexico. I have become convinced that President Obama is toxic to the Democratic Party, the nation, and, given our nation’s very large presence in the world, to the world. Although the common wisdom is that running a primary opponent against Obama would ensure a Democratic Party defeat in the general election, not challenging Obama and defeating him in a primary election would present a Hobson’s choice of either an Obama defeat in November 2012, or if he struggles through to a marrow victory, a continuation of four more years of feckless leadership.

This blog, then, will make the case that President Obama has broken many of the promises he made in the presidential campaign; he has taken policy positions that are directly contradictory to one another; he has rendered it almost impossible to know where he strands on almost any issue; he has almost deliberately alienated his most faithful supporters and tried to justify the betrayal by arguing that he is willing to make the tough decisions, even at the expense of his own party’s political fortunes; and he remains committed to the “grand bargain”, in which future spending cuts will greatly exceed tax increases — at least a four-to-one ratio by most estimates.

The two most unforgivable campaign promises that Obama has broken are: 1) his repeated promises to end the Bush tax cuts; and 2) his statement that “Senator McCain will cut Social Security, I will not.” Not only has President Obama committed himself to cutting Social Security, he will also cut Medicare and Medicaid. His agreement to a two-year extension of the Bush tax cuts and reduction of the FICA tax will blow another large hole in the Social Security trust fund.

Although this blog will focus primarily on the destructive nature of Obama’s performance, it will also propose alternative policies and directions for the nation.

The topics to lfollow in this blog will include: taxes and deficit reduction, health care reform, militarily-related spending, nuclear weapons and power, the intelligence complex, terrorism, civil liberties, immigration reform, regulation of big business, foreign and war policy, education, along with miscellaneous topics.

The first topic considered will be the very important one of taxes and deficit reduction.

I) Obama on Taxes and Deficit Reduction

The promise at that was at the core of Barack Obama’s “Yes We Can!” presidential campaign was to end the Bush tax cuts for those households earning over $250,000 — a promise made 50 times by one estimate. Obama wanted to take affirmative action to end tax cuts for the financially well-off and use the resulting revenue for deficit reduction and to fund health care reform. Later, he changed his position to just let the tax cuts expire for those earning over $250,000 under the original sunset provisions.

It thus came as a surprise or even shock that with very little public preparation, Obama, in December 2010, agreed to a two-year extension of the two major tax cuts enacted in George W. Bush’s first term. Along with the extension of the Bush tax cuts, President Obama proposed and got adopted a one-year, two percent cut — from 6.2 percent to 4.2 percent — in the employee’s share of the FICA tax, which funds Social Security. Obama also got a one-year extension of unemployment benefits.

Economists estimated that the tax package approved by Congress in December 2010 would reduce revenue and increase outlay by about a combined total of $900 billion. The one-year, two percent cut in the FICA tax rate would comprise $112 billion of the total.

It was political malfeasance of the highest order for President Obama and the Democratic lawmakers in control of both houses of Congress not to have adopted a budget for FY 2011 and dealt with the Bush tax cuts before the November 2010 elections. Later in the blog, a new tax structure will be proposed, in alliance with a single-payer health care insurance plan.

The next blog will focus on President Obama’s ill-fated entrance into the debt ceiling battle.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s